WASHINGTON, DC - In light of the decision by Judge Vaughn Walker to lift the stay on same sex marriages in California following his ruling to overturn Proposition 8, Brian Brown of the National Organization for Marriage offered the following response:
Writing for Real Clear Politics, noted libertarian columnist Steve Chapman notes in his column, “Overreaching on Gay Marriage:”
More from Rush Limbaugh’s August 5th commentary on Judge Vaughn Walker’s bias in the Prop 8 case:
Over the next couple of days, we’ll be posting various clips from Rush Limbaugh’s syndicated radio program on August 5th, in which he reacted to Judge Walker’s ruling in the Prop 8 case. Our thanks to Rush and to the EIB Network for permission to use these clips.
The court announced yesterday that Judge Walker would rule this morning (8/12) on the Prop 8 proponents’ motion to stay judgment during the appeal.
Jonathan Rauch, a major advocate for gay marriage, today in the NY Daily news called Judge Vaughn Walker's ruling in the Prop 8 case "radical." And he didn't mean that in a good way:
House Republican Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) today issued the following statement regarding recent court decisions on same-sex marriage:
Michael Medved answers Judge Walker's false charges including this one:
“Recognizing gay marriage would do nothing to harm existing opposite sex marriages.”
TalkRadioNews.com – District Judge Vaughn Walker’s decision last week to overturn a California ballot initiative that prohibited same-sex marriage was an example of “judicial activism at its worse,” according to Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas).
Washington D.C., Aug 10, 2010 / 04:57 am (CNA).- The anti-Proposition 8 decision’s claim that religious opinions about the sinfulness of homosexuality harm homosexuals is “outrageous” and could endanger both the place of religion in public life and religious liberty itself, legal experts and Catholic leaders have warned. . . .
Frum is optimistic about Prop 8's ultimate victory in court and pessimistic about the future of marriage:
